<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jake's Weblog &#187; Bugzilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/categories/computers/bugzilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog</link>
	<description>A blog by Jacob Steenhagen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bugzilla Install for Upcoming Events</title>
		<link>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2006/11/bugzilla-install-for-upcoming-events/</link>
		<comments>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2006/11/bugzilla-install-for-upcoming-events/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugzilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upcoming-events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried living with the trac bug system and it&#8217;s just way too limiting. Maybe if you&#8217;re the admin it&#8217;s configurable enough to live with, but as a normal user I found queries and what-not to be not very robust.
So I made a bugzilla install for my projects. Please file bugs here rather than in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried living with the trac bug system and it&#8217;s just way too limiting. Maybe if you&#8217;re the admin it&#8217;s configurable enough to live with, but as a normal user I found queries and what-not to be not very robust.</p>
<p>So I made a <a href="http://jacob.steenhagen.us/bugs/">bugzilla install for my projects</a>. Please file bugs here rather than in trac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2006/11/bugzilla-install-for-upcoming-events/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road to Bugzilla 2.18 is now paved.</title>
		<link>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/road-to-bugzilla-218-is-now-paved/</link>
		<comments>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/road-to-bugzilla-218-is-now-paved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugzilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/trunk/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 1/2 years after Bugzilla 2.16 was released, we&#8217;re very pleased to announce the release of Bugzilla 2.18. I told you we were a week ago, and now we&#8217;re there. Hop on over to bugzilla.org and check out the new version. While your there, you may also wish to read the latest status update. Of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first">2 1/2 years after Bugzilla 2.16 was released, we&#8217;re very pleased to announce the release of Bugzilla 2.18. I told you we were <a href="http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/blog/archives/000047.html">a week ago</a>, and now we&#8217;re there. Hop on over to <a href="http://bugzilla.org">bugzilla.org</a> and check out the new version. While your there, you may also wish to read the latest <a href="http://www.bugzilla.org/status/2005-01-15.html">status update</a>. Of note is the fact that the 2.20 feature freeze has been lifted and that freeze will now occur in March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/road-to-bugzilla-218-is-now-paved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road to Bugzilla 2.18&#8230; Part III</title>
		<link>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/road-to-bugzilla-218-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/road-to-bugzilla-218-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugzilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/trunk/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little more than a week has passed since I last updated my &#8220;Road to Bugzilla 2.18&#8221; numbers. Once again, Blue numbers will represent the net change since last time.

2.18 Blockers [4] [-5]
2.18 Blockers needing Review [2] [-1]
2.18 Blockers having Review, but needing Approval [0] [0]
2.18 Blockers having Review and Approval, but needing to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first">A little more than a week has passed since I last <a href="http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/blog/archives/000045.html">updated</a> my &#8220;<a href="http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/blog/archives/000043.html">Road to Bugzilla 2.18</a>&#8221; numbers. Once again, <span style="font-color:blue">Blue</span> numbers will represent the net change since <a href="http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/blog/archives/000045.html">last time</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B">2.18 Blockers</a> [4] <span style="color:blue">[-5]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&amp;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type1-0-0=equals&amp;value1-0-0=review%3F">2.18 Blockers needing Review</a> [2] <span style="color:blue">[-1]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&amp;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type1-0-0=equals&amp;value1-0-0=review%2B&amp;field2-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type2-0-0=equals&amp;value2-0-0=approval2.18%3F">2.18 Blockers having Review, but needing Approval</a> [0] <span style="color:blue">[0]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&amp;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type1-0-0=equals&amp;value1-0-0=approval2.18%2B">2.18 Blockers having Review and Approval, but needing to be checked in</a> [0] <span style="color:blue">[-3]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%3F">2.18 Blocking status requested</a> [1] <span style="color:blue">[+1]</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Reviewing my &#8220;Other&#8221; bugs from last time, we see that <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150149">bug 150149</a> (the release notes) has now moved from the &#8220;Other&#8221; category to the &#8220;Review Requested&#8221; one. <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276600">Bug 276600</a> and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274640">bug 274640</a> are now both FIXED.</p>
<p>New into the &#8220;Other&#8221; category, we have <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276237">bug 276237</a>, which deals with a charting issue (a mysterious problem that may be specific to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org">bmo</a>), and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159790">bug 159790</a>, which is simply the release tracking bug (which should have been a blocker all along).</p>
<p>So, what does all this mean? I&#8217;d say it means we&#8217;re <i>really</i> close now. In fact, it looks like 2.18 may actually be out before I leave Iraq <img src='http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/road-to-bugzilla-218-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated Road to Bugzilla 2.18</title>
		<link>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/updated-road-to-bugzilla-218/</link>
		<comments>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/updated-road-to-bugzilla-218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 09:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugzilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/trunk/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being that it&#8217;s now the begining of the new year, here&#8217;s an update to the numbers I posted previously: (Net change is in [Blue])

2.18 Blockers [9] [0]
2.18 Blockers needing Review [3] [-2]
2.18 Blockers having Review, but needing Approval [0] [-1]
2.18 Blockers having Review and Approval, but needing to be checked in [3] [+2]
2.18 Blocking status [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first">Being that it&#8217;s now the begining of the new year, here&#8217;s an update to the numbers I <a href="http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/blog/archives/000043.html">posted previously</a>: (Net change is in <span style="color:blue">[Blue]</span>)</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B">2.18 Blockers</a> [9] <span style="color:blue">[0]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&amp;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type1-0-0=equals&amp;value1-0-0=review%3F">2.18 Blockers needing Review</a> [3] <span style="color:blue">[-2]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&amp;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type1-0-0=equals&amp;value1-0-0=review%2B&amp;field2-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type2-0-0=equals&amp;value2-0-0=approval2.18%3F">2.18 Blockers having Review, but needing Approval</a> [0] <span style="color:blue">[-1]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&amp;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type1-0-0=equals&amp;value1-0-0=approval2.18%2B">2.18 Blockers having Review and Approval, but needing to be checked in</a> [3] <span style="color:blue">[+2]</span></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;product=Bugzilla&amp;resolution=---&amp;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&amp;type0-0-0=equals&amp;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%3F">2.18 Blocking status requested</a> [0] <span style="color:blue">[-6]</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Of the two &#8220;other&#8221; bugs, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275408">bug 275408</a> has been marked as a duplicate of <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245158">bug 245158</a> (which is fixed) and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150149">bug 150149</a> is the release notes.</p>
<p>A couple other bugs no longer fit into the above queries. One of those, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276600">bug 276600</a>, is waiting on an updated patch while the other, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274640">bug 274640</a>, is waiting on its first patch.</p>
<p>Overall, progress <i>is being made</i>. It may not be as fast as we&#8217;d all like, but it is still getting closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2005/01/updated-road-to-bugzilla-218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Road to Bugzilla 2.18</title>
		<link>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2004/12/the-road-to-bugzilla-218/</link>
		<comments>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2004/12/the-road-to-bugzilla-218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugzilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/trunk/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been promising version 2.18 of Bugzilla for ever, it seems. I&#8217;ve only been back for a short time, but I can find emails and bug comments dating back quite a while that suggest 2.18 would be out any day. I, for one, think that it&#8217;s about time we actually made that final push. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first">We&#8217;ve been promising version 2.18 of Bugzilla for ever, it seems. I&#8217;ve only been back <a href="http://www.steenhagen.us/~jake/blog/archives/000035.html">for a short time</a>, but I can find emails and bug comments dating back quite a while that suggest 2.18 would be out any day. I, for one, think that it&#8217;s about time we actually made that final push. As has been suggested before, review seems to be the major hold up. Because I&#8217;ve been out for so long, I don&#8217;t feel comfortable giving review on complicated patches, but I can give review (and I&#8217;ve done it) on simple, focused patches. What&#8217;s really needed is people who are very familiar with the current Bugzilla code-base to push those final few patches to their conclusion. To help people out (to include myself), here&#8217;s some queries that give information about 2.18 blockers (number in brackets are counts as of this writing):</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&#038;product=Bugzilla&#038;resolution=---&#038;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type0-0-0=equals&#038;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B">2.18 Blockers</a> [9]</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&#038;product=Bugzilla&#038;resolution=---&#038;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type0-0-0=equals&#038;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&#038;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type1-0-0=equals&#038;value1-0-0=review%3F">2.18 Blockers needing Review</a> [5]</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&#038;product=Bugzilla&#038;resolution=---&#038;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type0-0-0=equals&#038;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&#038;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type1-0-0=equals&#038;value1-0-0=review%2B&#038;field2-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type2-0-0=equals&#038;value2-0-0=approval2.18%3F">2.18 Blockers having Review, but needing Approval</a> [1]</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&#038;product=Bugzilla&#038;resolution=---&#038;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type0-0-0=equals&#038;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%2B&#038;field1-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type1-0-0=equals&#038;value1-0-0=approval2.18%2B">2.18 Blockers having Review and Approval, but needing to be checked in</a> [1]</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&#038;product=Bugzilla&#038;resolution=---&#038;field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&#038;type0-0-0=equals&#038;value0-0-0=blocking2.18%3F">2.18 Blocking status requested</a> [6]</li>
</ul>
<p>The 1 bug that appears to be ready for checkin was just checked into the tip, but the patch doesn&#8217;t apply to the 2.18 branch. There&#8217;s also two bugs on the blocker list that don&#8217;t fit any of the other queries. <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275408">Bug 275408</a> is in need of a patch and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150149">bug 150149</a> is for the release notes. I couldn&#8217;t find a query I was happy with for these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jacob.steenhagen.us/blog/2004/12/the-road-to-bugzilla-218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
