Comments on: Seperation of Church and State?

By: Lt.C. M.T.D. Ph.D./M.D.

Lt.C. M.T.D. Ph.D./M.D. — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:29:55 +0000

Animals seem to quite well without religion, and, polotics.

By: not an atheist

not an atheist — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:35:57 +0000

I agree with you 110%. They say that evolution is a fact… well its not… they can’t test it… it would take millions of years… besides, if they mention creationism as an alternative belief, not saying if it is right or wrong, there shouldn’t be a problem

By: hayley

hayley — Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:05:21 +0000

first of all I’m 15, and I get this seperation of church & state thing. It comes down to this ” who do you want to teach your kid about god?”. You of course want it to be you, But if we didn’t have the seperation of church & state any and all religions would be taught. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want my kid being taught about satanism. Since satanism is a religion. So think about that before going for religion in state.

By: Sam

Sam — Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:06:00 +0000

When we are taught about evolution in high school it is just as bothersome to those who believe in Christianity as it is for those who don’t to be taught other wise. How is it that it isn’t a problem to make Christians feel uncomfortable and make us learn something that we don’t believe, but when we even try to teach creation along with evolution, everyone makes a big deal about it? I just don’t really understand how it is any different when we talk about God, than it is for athiests or agnostics (which litterally translated means ignoramous) to put Him down and make a big deal about their “rights”. Christians don’t pay taxes to have their children taught incorrect information in science classes just like you don’t want to spend your tax money on what you think to be incorrect teaching.

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:42:42 +0000

The founding documents are filled with references to God. You folks want to throw all those out as unconstitutional?